Why Can't Democracy Trump Inequality?
Addresses the question, that amidst the doubling of the wealthiest Americans' income, "Why hasn't democracy slowed rising inequality?"
. . . .
Four political scientists are taking a crack at answering exactly this question in thecurrent issue of the American Economic Association’s Journal of Economic Perspectives, a special issue devoted to debating America’s vast gulf between the rich and everyone else.
The four analysts — Stanford’s Adam Bonica, Princeton’s Nolan McCarty, Keith Poole from the University of Georgia, and NYU’s Howard Rosenthal — lay out a nuanced reading of the American political scene that explores the interplay of a wide variety of factors, everything from the impact of the partisan gerrymandering of legislative districts to voter turnout by income level.
But one particular reality dramatically drives their analysis: Societies that let wealth concentrate at enormously intense levels will quite predictably end up with a wealthy who can concentrate enormous resources on getting their way.
These wealthy underwrite political campaigns. They spend fortunes on lobbying. They keep politicians and bureaucrats “friendly” to their interests with a “revolving door” that promises lucrative employment in the private sector.
. . . .
For the beginning and the remaining parts of the news analysis piece, go to the TruthOut site.
No comments:
Post a Comment