Protest Trump's camps! - Tuesday, July 2, 2019 afternoon update - From Closethecampsnow.org: All times Pacific Savings Time
We've seen the images and heard the stories coming out of child detention centers. Horrifically,
these conditions aren't an accident. They are the byproduct of an
intentional strategy by the Trump administration to terrorize immigrant
communities and criminalize immigration—from imprisoning
children in inhumane conditions to threatening widespread raids to break
up families to covering up reports of immigrants dying in U.S. custody
and abuses by ICE and CBP agents.
It’s going to take all of us to close the camps.
This Tuesday, July 2, while members of Congress are home for the Fourth of July holiday, we will gather at their local offices in protest. Our demands:
Close the Camps
Not One Dollar for Family Detention and Deportation
Bear Witness and Reunite Families
California: 5:30 pm:
Corner of Ygnacio Valley Road and N. Civic Dr. | Walnut Creek
Ygnacio Valley Rd. & N. Civic Drive Walnut Creek, CA 94597
5:30 pm:
580 freeway overpass at Ardley Ave
overpass near: 1615 MacArthur Blvd Oakland, CA 94602
Protest Trump's camps! - Tuesday, July 2, 2019 afternoon update - From Closethecampsnow.org: Click this link to find protests near you.
We've seen the images and heard the stories coming out of child detention centers. Horrifically,
these conditions aren't an accident. They are the byproduct of an
intentional strategy by the Trump administration to terrorize immigrant
communities and criminalize immigration—from imprisoning
children in inhumane conditions to threatening widespread raids to break
up families to covering up reports of immigrants dying in U.S. custody
and abuses by ICE and CBP agents.
It’s going to take all of us to close the camps.
This Tuesday, July 2, while members of Congress are home for the Fourth of July holiday, we will gather at their local offices in protest. Our demands:
Close the Camps
Not One Dollar for Family Detention and Deportation
Protest Trump's camps! - Tuesday, July 2, 2019 afternoon update Click this link to find protests near you.
We've seen the images and heard the stories coming out of child detention centers. Horrifically,
these conditions aren't an accident. They are the byproduct of an
intentional strategy by the Trump administration to terrorize immigrant
communities and criminalize immigration—from imprisoning
children in inhumane conditions to threatening widespread raids to break
up families to covering up reports of immigrants dying in U.S. custody
and abuses by ICE and CBP agents.
It’s going to take all of us to close the camps.
This Tuesday, July 2, while members of Congress are home for the Fourth of July holiday, we will gather at their local offices in protest. Our demands:
Close the Camps
Not One Dollar for Family Detention and Deportation
In New Jersey: Elizabeth Detention Center7:00 pm
625 Evans Street, Elizabeth 07201
4 blocks southeast of North Avenue and Dowd Avenue, directly south of the Newark Liberty Airport.
From downtown Elizabeth take Trumbull Street east, under I-95, then left on Dowd Avenue. In New England: Central Falls, RI Detention Center 6:00 pm Wyatt Detention Center 950 High Street Central Falls, RI 02863 - off Exit 30 of I-95.
Maryland: 5:30 pm: Congressman Andy Harris' office
15 E Churchville Rd Ste 102B, Bel Air, MD
5:30 pm:
CASA of Maryland Press Conference at Southeast Anchor Libary
President Donald Trump is in full meltdown mode over former aide and strategist Steve Bannon's comments: Bannon's exposed how Donald Trump called his daughter Ivanka "as dumb as a brick"!
Incidentally, the book officially goes to commercial release tomorrow --according to cable news reports, in text, e-book and audiobook formats. According to the Los Angeles Times, Wolff's 'Fire and Fury' gets its formal release next Tuesday, January 9.
After Trump's colossul 1990s bankruptcies, Trump turned to lenders of last resort: Russian mob figures. The key figures from Kazakhstan are named. The main hinge with the Trump Organization is the Bayrock Group.
We see the essential details: that Trump's business doings of the last 20 years are intertwined with organized crime figures with Bayrock. We see his deposition with a dubious disavowal of familiarity with Bayrock managing director Felix Sater, followed by the revelation that Trump soon after bestowed Trump Organization legitimacy on Sater, with a Trump Organization business card and email address.
The video has strong credibility with powerful quotes by author and former CIA agent Malcolm Nance, attorney Frederick Oberlander and unofficial Trump biographer Michael D'Antonio.
After you watch the video you will come to the same conclusion that Oberlander, that charges can be brought against Trump, and after that it will be "all over."
A federal judge in New York has set an initial date on which the two sides must appear in court, December, a month after Trump faces the presidential election.
Federal Judge Ronnie Abrams has ordered that the status conference hearing for 16 December in a New York court.
The British newspaper also reported,
A federal judge has ordered a status conference hearing after a woman filed a lawsuit claiming Donald Trump raped her when she was 13-years-old in 1994.
In the lawsuit a witness, identified by the pseudonym Tiffany Doe, alleges she saw Mr Trump and billionaire-paedophile Jeffrey Epstein repeatedly rape the plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe.
The complaint claims Epstein hired an unidentified woman to pick up teenage girls to bring to his parties.
The lawsuit,
filed in the U.S. District Court of New York, alleges that Trump and
financier Jeffrey Epstein raped two underage girls at several parties at
Epstein’s apartment in Manhattan. The girls, identified in court
documents as “Tiffany Doe” and “Jane Doe,” were allegedly promised money
and modeling careers if they attended the parties.
The details
described in the document are graphic. At one party, Trump is accused of
tying one of the young girls to the bed before raping her while the
victim repeatedly plead with him to stop.
Gloria Allred Says More Women Are Contacting Her About Trump Misconduct
The lawyer, who has represented victims in high profile sex offender cases, that she is seeking more women who have been victimized by Republican Party nominee Donald Trump.
Gloria Allred, the civil rights lawyer who takes on high-profile targets, like Bill Cosby, Roman Polanski and, yes, Trump, confirmed to us that since the Access Hollywood tape's release, she has been "contacted by women who allege inappropriate contact by Mr. Trump."
From the Gothamist, yesterday, October 10, 2016:
More to the point, Allred discussed how Trump's words suggest
criminal behavior. "If there is an unwanted or unconsented to touching
of a person’s intimate parts such as the genital areas or a woman’s
breasts, that could constitute a sexual assault or a sexual battery,"
she explained yesterday. She added that "when Rudy Giuliani was asked" on Sunday's political programs
"if Donald Trump was describing a sexual assault on the recently
released 2005 video, he responded, 'That’s what he was talking about.'"
Allred said, "I am disgusted by what Donald Trump said and admitted that
he had done on that video. An apology is not enough."
The Access Hollywood tape was discovered after the AP's report featuring former crew members on Trump's reality show, The Apprentice,
describing his demeaning behavior towards women; in one example, he
allegedly judges female contestants' breast sizes and discusses which
women he'd want to have sex with. Allred released a statement last week, citing the numerous sexual harassment lawsuits
and his lecherous behavior: "If Mr. Trump were to be elected president
he would be the employer of the largest workforce in the country,
federal government employees. Mr. Trump in that role would be sending a
message through his past words and actions that sexual harassment of
women in the workplace is acceptable and this could lead to other
employers believing that they can follow Mr. Trump’s lead and openly
sexually harass their female employees, thereby creating and condoning a
hostile workplace for working women."
We need a
President who respects the rights of women in the workplace not someone
who creates a hostile and sexist environment for women who work and not
someone like Mr. Trump who believes pregnancy is an inconvenience for
employers; and who enables sexism.
I call on Donald Trump to release all of his employees and former
employees from their non-disclosure clauses so that they can tell the
public what they suffered when they had the unfortunate experience of
working for Donald Trump, and I urge him to promise not to retaliate
against them if they tell the truth.
Donald Trump once made a remark to TMZ about
me. He said "Gloria would be very very impressed" which TMZ suggested
in the context of the interview with him meant that I would be impressed
with his penis.
No Donald, I wouldn’t. What would impress me would be having Hillary
Rodham Clinton in the White House, not a man who blatantly denigrates
women in the workplace.
Allred, a Clinton supporter, was a delegate at the Democratic National Convention.
Disgraced Republican Party presidential nominee Donald Trump on Sunday paraded out the women who accused Bill Clinton of sexual assault in the 1990s.
First, he did this at his press conference and then he did this at the town hall debate in St. Louis, attempting to seat them in the front row. As we see below, about 20 years ago, he cast Clinton as the victim of the women.
Now, it is horrendous if Bill Clinton committed sexual assault against the women. However, it seems just gratuitous and self-serving if Trump only brings up the issue in the eleventh hour of his campaign when his numbers are sliding.
Read what Trump said in 1998 about his accusers. He only seems to be concerned for the women's rights and dignity now that he is opposing Bill Clinton's wife in an election. As reported at WSGW, FM Talk 100.5 of Carrollton, Michigan, "Flashback: Donald Trump Called Bill Clinton’s Accusers ‘Terrible’ and ‘Unattractive’ and Former President ‘Terrific’":
But if you rewind to 1998, the Republican presidential nominee had a
very different view of the 42nd president, defending him as the real
“victim” in the wake of the fallout of the Monica Lewinsky scandal and
blasting the accusers as “terrible” and “unattractive.”
He also suggested that Clinton should have kept the scandal — which he said “should have been nothing — to himself.”
Days after President Clinton admitted to having an inappropriate
relationship with former White House intern Monica Lewinsky, Trump said
Clinton was a “victim” and critiqued the physical appearances of various
women with whom Clinton had been accused of having extramarital
relations at different times.
“It’s like it’s from hell, it’s a terrible group of people,” Trump
said in an interview with FOX News’ Neil Cavuto on Aug. 19, 1998.
Asked by Cavuto if Clinton’s image as a “quasi-sex symbol” stood to
somehow benefit from the alleged extramarital relations, Trump took
issue with the characterization.
“I don’t necessarily agree with his victims, his victims are
terrible,” Trump said. “He is really a victim himself. But he put
himself in that position.”
“The whole group, Paula Jones, Lewinsky, it’s just a really unattractive group. I’m not just talking about physical,” he said.
“Would it be any different if it were a supermodel crowd?” Cavuto then asked.
“I think at least it would be more pleasant to watch,” Trump replied.
More damning links on Trump's offensive sexual objectification: Jill Harth -who reports being raped by Trump / 'The Apprentice producer warns that worse material is coming / Trump's years of vulgar statements on the Howard Stern show / Trump barging in on Miss Universe dressing rooms / Creepy Trump statements about daughter Ivanka
The woman who Republican Party nominee Donald Trump said tried to rape her was speaking out yesterday, October 8. For details of the assault, read this Slate article from Friday, "The 1997 Lawsuit Alleging Trump Groped a Woman Just as He Bragged About on Video." (Of course, for legal reasons we should say "alleged," but can we doubt the claim, especially after all that we have heard this year about Trump's groping and sexually verbal abuse of women?)
In 1997, a makeup artist and former business associate named
Jill Harth alleged that Trump had groped her on multiple occasions. In
her suit, which you can read here, Harth described one of these advances as “attempted rape.” As the Guardianreported in July, that suit was dropped after Trump settled a separate business lawsuit with Harth’s partner George Houraney.
Harth, Houraney, and Trump were working on a pin-up
competition together when Trump allegedly began making sexual advances.
The project began in December 1992. According to Harth, in January 1993,
Trump's behavior escalated. In her 1997 deposition, written about
recently in the New York Times, Harth testified
that at a business dinner Trump “name-dropped throughout that [meal],
when he wasn’t groping me under the table.” Here’s how the lawsuit
described the incident:
Then, the lawsuit alleges, Trump tried to get Harth into his daughter’s bedroom alone. When he was with Harth in Ivanka Trump’s bedroom, Trump allegedly groped her again.
* * *
Given all the sickening things that we have heard that Trump has said and done, is it not time that we give serious attention and weight to the allegations that Trump raped a 13 year old child?
Here is the Huffington Post report just a few months ago on the allegations:
Just consider these points about the witness in the case. It is rare that there are witnesses in such cases willing to come forward. The earlier dismissals of the case demonstrate the power Trump has to get such suits dismissed. Notice how she is afraid of consequences from Trump. This fear would be well founded when you see how glibly Trump threatened to have one of his "friends" deal with Rosie O'Donnell's girlfriend. (See yesterday's post at this page.) Trump is alleged to have raped 13 year old girl in 1994, while Trump was at a party held by Jeffrey Epstein, a now convicted sex offender of underage girls.
Tiffany Doe
says that she recruited Jane Doe at the Port Authority in New York,
persuaded her to attend Mr. Epstein’s parties, and actually witnessed the sexual assaults on Jane Doe:
I
personally witnessed the Plaintiff being forced to perform various
sexual acts with Donald J. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Both Mr. Trump and
Mr. Epstein were advised that she was 13 years old.
It is exceedingly rare for a sexual assault victim to have a witness. But Tiffany Doe says:
I
personally witnessed four sexual encounters that the Plaintiff was
forced to have with Mr. Trump during this period, including the fourth
of these encounters where Mr. Trump forcibly raped her despite her
pleas to stop.
Tiffany Doe
corroborates, based on her own personal observations, just about
everything in Jane Doe’s complaint: that twelve year old Maria was
involved in a sex act with Mr. Trump, that Mr. Trump threatened the
life of Jane Doe if she ever revealed what happened, and that she would
“disappear” like Maria if she did.
Tiffany Doe herself says that she is in mortal fear of Mr. Trump to this day: I am coming forward to swear to the truthfulness of the physical
and sexual abuse that I personally witnessed of minor females at the
hands of Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein . . . I swear to these facts under
the penalty for perjury even though I fully understand that the life of
myself and my family is now in grave danger.
Given all this,
and based on the record thus far, Jane Doe’s claims appear credible.
Mr. Epstein’s own sexual crimes and parties with underage girls are
well documented, as is Mr. Trump’s relationship with him two decades
ago in New York City. Mr. Trump told a reporter
a few years ago: “I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He’s a
lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as
much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about
it, Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”
Powerfully, Jane Doe appears to have an eyewitness
to all aspects of her claim, a witness who appears to have put herself
in substantial danger by coming forward, because at a minimum Mr.
Epstein knows her true identity.
The New York Daily News reported in "Pedophile billionaire Jeffrey Epstein told to be 'out of the country' ahead of book release" a few days ago that a book is due out tomorrow on the sordid life of Epstein. Unsurprisingly, Trump appears in the book, in an unflattering manner. Naturally, this will be a giant public relations disaster for the campaign and the Republican Party. Defiantly, Trump will not leave the race, so elected officials with the party have no choice other than to abandon him.
The blockbuster book is also expected to further embarrass celebs who
once partied with Epstein. Among the allegations that popped up when the
suits first started piling up against Epstein is a claim by an aspiring
model that Trump raped her in 1994, when she was 13. The bloviating
billionaire has vehemently denied the charge, which was voluntarily dismissed in September, but filed again earlier this week. A previous lawsuit by the same plaintiff was dismissed by a California federal court judge earlier this year.
Republican nominee Donald Trump's friend, Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein served 13 months in prison for soliciting an underage prostitute.
(AP)
“It’s no coincidence that this book is coming out just before the election,” says our source.
Pruitt posted this on Twitter Saturday night, "As a producer on seasons 1 & 2 of #theapprentice I assure you: when
it comes to the #trumptapes there are far worse. #justthebegininng"
While some have speculated that Pruitt has a non-disclosure agreement, it is unclear whether or not this would apply to Pruitt or if a violation could be legally defended in the interest of the "public good."
Buzzfeed, among others, has swooped in to get the goods from Pruitt, if such goods actually exist. And judging by the footage with Access Hollywood's Billy Bush, it's no stretch of the imagination that another smoking gun video exists.
And before Friday's bombshell hot mike recordings of Trump's and Billy Bush's extremely lewd conversation and the widely disclosed vulgar actions towards women on 'Apprentice,' there were revelations of Trump's crude remarks earlier this year. For example, see this clip from Inside Edition, uploaded by the show on February 25, 2016, regarding Trump's late 1990s appearances:
Donald Trump's crass musings on women are now being unearthed. Buzzfeed
has published a rundown of the billionaire's comments from his
appearances on Howard Stern beginning in the late 1990s. "A person who
is very flat-chested is very hard to be a 10," Trump told Stern. He also
said he found Angelina Jolie unattractive because of her lips. He spoke
often of Princess Diana, saying he could have bedded her. Trump also
said he wanted children with Melania, but he wouldn't spend time with
them.
Washington Post, reporting Saturday, October 8, on how he spoke of how voluptuous his daughter Ivanka was, how 35 year old women were over the hill, how he was OK with having sex with 24 year old women.
ET Interviewer, referring to Donald Trump, Republican nominee: "What will you do if he becomes president? Is it time to leave the country?"
Rosie, looking directly at the camera,
"He will never be president!"
Maybe the real reason that Donald Trump doesn't like Rosie O'Donnell is that she did the best imitation of Trump during her on 'The View' - click here for the link to the 2006 video, and that was 10 years before Alec Baldwin did his on Saturday Night Live last week. She also criticized Trump for forgiving the party crazed coking (as in cocaine, not the soft drink) episode of beauty pageant crown winner, Tara Conner, Miss USA.
She lists out Trump's marital infidelities and then says mockingly, "And he's the moral compass for 20 year olds! Sit and spin, my friend."
Listen to how forward seeing she was, that she points out that he got off, scot-free for his multiple bankruptcies. And this was years before the rest of us and the media had caught wind of the fact that he's an incompetent in financial matters.
Further driving the dagger is that she pointed out that the inheritance from Daddy Fred (who died in 1999) is a main resource that got him on good financial footing after his 1990s business failures. "You know what saved him the second [bankruptcy] time, after his father died he paid off all his bankruptcy. This is not a self-made man."
"This guy is like one of those snake oil salesmen on 'Little House on the Prairie.'"
Trump, just like he's doing in 2016 to Alicia Machado, he kept up the attack, and went on 'Anderson360' to attack. He lied when Anderson Cooper asked for him to address his multiple bankruptcies.
See this other video, on 'Anderson Live,' with a guest host filling in for Cooper. In this 2012, O'Donnell reported that the Trump Steakhouse in Las Vegas got a C health rating.
Sure, billionaire real estate tycoon Donald Trump is an obnoxious silly birther.
But we should take Trump's suggestion of a 25 percent tariff on Chinese imports as a welcome opportunity to side-step the hysterical Smoot-Hawley invoking and trade war invoking reactions. We should welcome an open public discussion and debate that questions our nation's unusual hewing to free trade orthodoxy in a market that East Asian and European successes do not follow free trade.
First off, America's dynamic time of growth, 1890 to 1920 was in a period of high tariffs.
Calling attention to the Smoot-Haley trade act is deceptive. As one blogger at Market Oracle notes in "Why Donald Turmp is right on trade," reputable economists, even free traders, from liberal Paul Krugman to conservative Milton Friedman, dispute Smoot-Hawley's role in the Great Depression.
Read further, this important blog post. (Of course, I am not endorsing Trump or all opinions in the politics of the referenced site.), Ian Fletcher, "Why Donald Trump is Right on Trade" at marketoracle.co.uk.
The usual suspects are racing to debunk Donald Trump’s foray into the most serious protectionism—a 25% tariff on China—proposed by a major presidential candidate since Patrick Buchanan ran in 1992.
They know this is big. Our long-delayed national trade debate has begun.
I have expressed reservations about getting obsessed with just China before. But broadly speaking, Trump is right on the money here. Nothing less than an actual tariff or the equivalent is ever going to get Beijing to stop gaming the international trading system to America’s disadvantage.
This matters, big-time. Because until we sort out America’s trade mess—which must start by zeroing out, or close to it, our $600 billion-a-year trade deficit—our economy will never truly be healthy again.
Jobs are the aspect of this everyone understands. But what a lot of people miss is that the current budget fight, and the angst over our mounting national debt, are also intimately connected to trade.
So Trump is onto something even bigger than people realize.
The budget fight ultimately comes down to the fact that we don’t have an economy large enough to generate tax revenue commensurate with the spending we have voted for. But why isn’t our economy big enough? Start with the fact that, as economist William Bahr has estimated, America’s accumulated trade deficits since 1991 alone have caused our economy to be 13 percent smaller than it otherwise would be. The trade deficit costs us about one percent in GDP growth every year, and that compounds over time.
As for our national debt, or, more properly, our bloating public and private indebtedness? As I explained at length in another article, borrowing money (and selling off existing wealth, which has the same net effect) is a mathematically inevitable result of running trade deficits. The only way this can not happen is if a) the aforementioned $600 billion isn’t real money, or b) America is trading with Santa’s elves.
So, Mr. Trump… How do we rebalance America’s trade, starting with China?
Forget about doing it by playing nice. China will only give up one-way free trade (free for America, protectionist for them) when they are coerced into doing so. They are making far too much money to ever give up this sweet racket voluntarily.
We are constantly warned that imposing a tariff on China would trigger a trade war. But the curious thing about the concept of trade war is that, unlike actual shooting war, it has no actual historical precedent. In fact, the reality is that there has never been a significant trade war.
Anyone who knows otherwise, please name one.
The usual example free traders give is America's Smoot-Hawley tariff of 1930, which supposedly either caused the Great Depression or caused it to spread around the world. But this canard does not survive serious examination, and has actually been denied by almost every economist who has actually researched the question in depth—including many free traders and ranging from Paul Krugman on the left to Milton Friedman on the right. (I debunked this myth at length in this article.)
There is, in fact, a basic unresolved paradox at the bottom of the very concept of trade war. If, as free traders insist, free trade is beneficial whether or not one's trading partners reciprocate, then why would any rational nation start one, no matter how provoked? Wouldn’t they just keep lapping up the benefits of one-way free trade, if it’s so good for them?
Furthermore, if the moneymen in Beijing, Tokyo, Berlin, and the other nations currently running trade surpluses against the U.S. start to ponder exaggerated retaliation against the U.S., they will soon discover the advantage is with us, not them. Because they are the ones with the trade surpluses to lose, not us. What exactly does the U.S. have to lose in a trade war? The only way a deficit nation can “lose” a trade war is by having its trade balance get even worse. Given that the U.S. trade balance is already outlandish, it is hard to see how this could happen.
Supposedly, China could suddenly stop buying our Treasury Debt.
Indeed they could, but this would immediately reduce the value of the $1.15 trillion or so they already hold. Furthermore, this would depress the value of the dollar—exactly the opposite of their currency manipulation strategy.
Then there is the awkward problem of what China would do with all the money it would get by selling off its dollars. There just aren't that many good alternatives for parking that much money. Japan doesn't want its currency used as an international reserve currency, and the Euro has huge problems. Assets like gold and minor currencies are volatile or in limited supply. Others, like real estate or corporate stocks, are still denominated in those pesky dollars and euros.
We are still a nuclear power, so at the end of the day, China cannot force us to do anything that we don't want to. We could—a grossly irresponsible but not impossible hypothetical—repudiate our debt to them (or stop paying the interest) as the ultimate countermove.
More plausibly, we might simply restore the tax on the interest on foreign-held bonds that was repealed in 1984 thanks to Treasury Secretary Donald Regan. We have lots of little cards like that up our sleeve.
So an understanding will, most likely, be reached. A deal (one of Mr. Trump’s favorite words!) will be struck. I think Mr. Trump understands this better than anyone else. That’s one of the things I like about him.
The reality is that the United States is already in a trade war with China. Kowtowing to China today is economic appeasement, with the same result as political appeasement in the 1930s: a few more years of relative quiet with a bigger explosion at the end.
At some point, America's ability to run gigantic deficits must end, due to a prolonged slide or sudden crash in the value of the dollar. The longer we wait, the greater the likelihood that it will come as a sudden and destabilizing shock, rather than a managed, more gradual adjustment.
This issue is bigger than China alone. How America deals with China will set the precedent, and establish or destroy America's credibility, for dealing with a long list of other nations.
Believe me, they’re watching Trump now in Tokyo, Berlin, and Brussels.
Ian Fletcher is the author of the new book Free Trade Doesn’t Work: What Should Replace It and Why (USBIC, $24.95) He is an Adjunct Fellow at the San Francisco office of the U.S. Business and Industry Council, a Washington think tank founded in 1933. He was previously an economist in private practice, mostly serving hedge funds and private equity firms. He may be contacted at ian.fletcher@usbic.net.
"That was but a prelude; where they burn books, they will ultimately burn people also."
Apocrophal words of Heinrich Heine (1821) for the 20th, 21st century
On the occasion of the trashing of the Occupy Wall Street Library: "Das war ein Vorspiel nur, dort wo man Bücher verbrennt, verbrennt man auch am Ende Menschen." ("That was but a prelude; where they burn books, they will ultimately burn people also.")
Videographer Scott Campbell Describes Oakland PD Firing Rubber Bullets at Him
Judge Nelson Rejects Arrests of Occupy Nashville Protestors, This Defends Free Speech
Oakland Police Fire Light Grenade at Protestors Aiding Fallen Protestor
Occupy Wall Street - NYPD Gone Wild - Attacking Protesters With Motor Bikes
Posts
